Not dead yet: the danger of ‘End-ism’:
But, there is also an underlying thought process going on – what I’ll call ‘End-ism’ – which is a dangerously reductive way of viewing the impact of structural and disruptive change within a sector.  Whenever a business, a medium or a way of doing things that has been dominant for decades faces a profound challenge, perhaps the most significant in its existance, End-ists will automatically declare it ‘dead’ or ‘over’.
Microsoft Office, for example, is officially dead because of Google Apps. Errr, except it isn’t. Office – for all it’s flaws – is still the cornerstone of a $19bn business within Microsoft. And Powerpoint, Word, Excel and Outlook are the average office worker’s equivalent of the major food groups: unless they get them all regularly, they get crotchety and start to look pasty.
End-ists are also normally rampant neophiliacs. So blinded by their love of something new, that they forget the rest of the world is still  devoutedly wedded to the old. [I should add at this stage, I speak from some experience here].
The problem with this thinking is that the new doesn’t automatically mean the end of the old.
